Mangini v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Mangini v. United States, 319 F.3d 1079 (9th Cir. 2003)
2003 WL 262196

Mangini v. United States

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The Opinion filed January 9, 2003, is amended as follows:

At Slip Opinion page 227, line 33: delete footnote 2, and replace with a new footnote 2 stating, “Because of the additional evidence that has come to light, *1080we need not consider whether we would reach a different result were we reviewing Judge Malloy’s decision on the record before him.”
At Slip Opinion page 227, line 25 [after sentence “We also note that the record of Jackson’s contacts with the expert is incomplete .... ”]: add the following sentence, “As the record stands, we find no direct evidence of an intent to deceive Judge Molloy, but nevertheless, Jackson clearly acted as a lawyer in the proceeding and Hoyt & Blewett failed to disclose all the relevant facts.”

With these amendments to the Opinion, the panel has unanimously voted to deny appellee’s petition for a rehearing.

Reference

Full Case Name
Elaine R. MANGINI v. UNITED STATES of America, Department of the Interior, National Park Service, and Dick Gottsegen, dba Timberline Adventures, aka Timberline Bicycle Tours
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published