U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2003

Mangini v. United States

Mangini v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided February 10, 2003 · Nelson, Thomas, Trott
319 F.3d 1079; 2003 WL 262196 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Mangini v. United States

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The Opinion filed January 9, 2003, is amended as follows:

At Slip Opinion page 227, line 33: delete footnote 2, and replace with a new footnote 2 stating, “Because of the additional evidence that has come to light, *1080we need not consider whether we would reach a different result were we reviewing Judge Malloy’s decision on the record before him.”
At Slip Opinion page 227, line 25 [after sentence “We also note that the record of Jackson’s contacts with the expert is incomplete .... ”]: add the following sentence, “As the record stands, we find no direct evidence of an intent to deceive Judge Molloy, but nevertheless, Jackson clearly acted as a lawyer in the proceeding and Hoyt & Blewett failed to disclose all the relevant facts.”

With these amendments to the Opinion, the panel has unanimously voted to deny appellee’s petition for a rehearing.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.