United States v. Spangle

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit January 16, 2003

United States v. Spangle, 54 F. App'x 653 (9th Cir. 2003)

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Kenneth Lyle Spangle appeals from his 24-month sentence imposed following the revocation of his supervised release. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Spangle’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no arguable issues for review, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Spangle filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no issues warranting review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Reference

Full Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee v. Kenneth Lyle SPANGLE
Status: Published