U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2003

United States v. Herrera-Chavez

United States v. Herrera-Chavez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided January 17, 2003
54 F. App'x 666

United States v. Herrera-Chavez

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Javier Herrrera-Chavez appeals his jury-trial conviction and 66-month sentence imposed for illegal reentry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Herrrera-Chavez’s attorney has *667filed a brief and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Herrrera-Chavez has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our review of the Anders brief and our independent review of the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no issues requiring further review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.