U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2003

United States v. Bonillas-Rosas

United States v. Bonillas-Rosas
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided March 14, 2003
57 F. App'x 764

United States v. Bonillas-Rosas

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Hector Paz Bonillas-Rosas appeals his jury-trial conviction and 84-month sentence imposed for illegally reentering the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Bonillas-Rosas’ attorney has filed a brief and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Bonil-las-Rosas has filed a pro se supplemental brief.

*765Our review of the Anders and pro se briefs and our independent review of the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no issues requiring further review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.