U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2003

United States v. Herrera-Chavez

United States v. Herrera-Chavez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided March 17, 2003
58 F. App'x 728

United States v. Herrera-Chavez

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM**

Daniel Herrera-Chavez appeals his conviction by guilty plea and his 70-month sentence for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Herrera-Chavez’s counsel has submitted a brief stating that he has found no meritorious issues for review. Appellant has not filed a supplemental pro se brief.

Our independent review of the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346,102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no issues requiring further review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is *729GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.