U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2003

United States v. Grundy

United States v. Grundy
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided March 17, 2003
58 F. App'x 735

United States v. Grundy

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM**

Frederick A. Grundy appeals the district court’s judgment and sentence imposed following revocation of Grundy’s supervised release. Grundy’s attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and a motion to withdraw based on counsel’s failure to discover any arguable issues for review. Grundy did not file a pro se supplemental brief. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable issues.

We therefore GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw and AFFIRM the district court’s judgment.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.