U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2003

United States v. Maneses-Flores

United States v. Maneses-Flores
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided April 16, 2003 · Fisher, Kleinfeld, Rymer
61 F. App'x 458

United States v. Maneses-Flores

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM**

Antonio Maneses-Flores appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 57-month sentence imposed for illegally reentering the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. ManesesFlores’s attorney has filed a brief and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Maneses-Flores has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our review of the Anders brief and our independent review of the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no issues requiring further review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.1

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

. All pending motions are denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.