U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2003

United States v. Allen

United States v. Allen
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided April 21, 2003 · Browning, Kleinfeld, Rymer
61 F. App'x 491

United States v. Allen

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM**

Shawn Allen appeals his guilty-plea convictions and concurrent 151-month sentences imposed for two counts of bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). Allen’s attorney has filed a brief and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Allen has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our review of the Anders brief and our independent review of the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no issues requiring further review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.1

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

. All pending motions are denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.