MEMORANDUM**

Ronnie Robinson, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition challenging his jury conviction for possession of cocaine base for sale and his three strikes sentence of 25 years to life imprisonment.

Robinson contends that his 25 years to life plus ten years sentence under California’s three strikes law, CaLPenal Code Ann. § 667 (West 1999), constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. This contention is foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decisions in Lockyer v. Andrade, — U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 1166, 1174, 155 L.Ed.2d 155 *189(2003) (holding that a state court’s decision to affirm petitioner’s 25 years to life terms under the three strikes law was not contrary to, or an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law), and Ewing v. California, — U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 1179, 1190, 155 L.Ed.2d 108 (2003) (holding that petitioner’s 25 years to life sentence under the California three strikes law did not violate the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment).1

AFFIRMED.