U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2003

United States v. Aguilar-Hernandez

United States v. Aguilar-Hernandez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided May 15, 2003 · Graber, Pregerson, Reinhardt
63 F. App'x 367

United States v. Aguilar-Hernandez

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM**

Juan Carlos Aguilar-Hernandez appeals his conviction, following a guilty plea, for importation of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960.

Aguilar-Hernandez’s contention that 21 U.S.C. § 960 is facially unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), and that Harris v. United States, 536 U.S. 545, 122 S.Ct. 2406, 153 L.Ed.2d 524 (2002), overruled United States v. Buckland, 289 F.3d 558, 562 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 1105, 122 S.Ct. 2314, 152 L.Ed.2d 1067 (2002) is foreclosed by United States v. Hernandez, 322 F.3d 592 (9th Cir. 2003). Aguilar-Hernandez’s conviction is

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.