U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2003

United States v. Renteria-Barragan

United States v. Renteria-Barragan
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided May 20, 2003 · Graber, Pregerson, Reinhardt
63 F. App'x 407

United States v. Renteria-Barragan

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM**

Cesar Rene Rentería-Barragan appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 70-month *408sentence for being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C § 1326. Renteria-Barragan’s counsel filed a motion to withdraw as counsel of record and a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Rentería-Barragan has not filed a pro se supplemental brief, and appellee did not file an answering brief. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742, and we affirm.

Our review of the Anders brief and our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), does not reveal any arguable issues for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel of record is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.