U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2003

Edmund Y. Chein v. Richard Shumsky, Chief Probation Officer La County California State Attorney General

Edmund Y. Chein v. Richard Shumsky, Chief Probation Officer La County California State Attorney General
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided March 14, 2003 · Fernandez, Rawlinson, Shea
323 F.3d 748; 2003 Daily Journal DAR 2921; 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2303; 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 4525; 2003 WL 1112347 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Charles M. Sevilla, Cleary & Sevilla, San Diego, CA, for the petitioner-appellant., Brentford Ferriera (brief) and Matthew G. Monforton, Deputy District Attorneys, Los Angeles, CA, for the real party in interest, State of California.

Edmund Y. Chein v. Richard Shumsky, Chief Probation Officer La County California State Attorney General

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Concurring in Part

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.