Ginny v. White Jimmie D. White v. Ford Motor Company, a Delaware Corporation, and Orscheln Company, a Missouri Corporation
Ginny v. White Jimmie D. White v. Ford Motor Company, a Delaware Corporation, and Orscheln Company, a Missouri Corporation
335 F.3d 833; 2003 Daily Journal DAR 7384; 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5853; 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 13541; 2003 WL 21513213
(Federal Reporter, Third Series)
Ginny v. White Jimmie D. White v. Ford Motor Company, a Delaware Corporation, and Orscheln Company, a Missouri Corporation
Opinion
ORDER
The majority opinion filed on December 3, 2002, is amended as follows.
At page 18, lines 19-21 of the slip opinion, delete the sentence ‘We need not decide whether the district court abused its discretion in allowing the opinion into evidence in this case, because we reverse on other grounds.” Also, delete footnote 26, referred to at the end of that sentence. Substitute the sentence, “Nevertheless, we cannot say that the district judge abused his discretion in allowing the opinion into evidence in this case.”
With these amendments, the petition for rehearing is denied. No further petitions for rehearing may be filed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.