Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2003

Edmund Y. Chein v. Richard Shumsky, Chief Probation Officer La County California State Attorney General

Edmund Y. Chein v. Richard Shumsky, Chief Probation Officer La County California State Attorney General
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided August 13, 2003
340 F.3d 786; 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7300; 2003 Daily Journal DAR 9352; 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 16616; 2003 WL 21962483 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Edmund Y. Chein v. Richard Shumsky, Chief Probation Officer La County California State Attorney General

Opinion

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, 1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

1

. Judge Fisher was recused.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑