Feitelberg v. Merrill Lynch & Co.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit December 24, 2003

Feitelberg v. Merrill Lynch & Co., 353 F.3d 765 (9th Cir. 2003)

2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 26266

Opinion

353 F.3d 765

Jerome FEITELBERG, On Behalf of Himself, All Others Similarly Situated, And The General Public, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MERRILL LYNCH & CO., a Delaware Corporation; Thomas Mazzucco; Henry Blodget, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 02-17236.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted December 5, 2003 — San Francisco, California.

Filed December 24, 2003.

Solomon B. Cera, Gold Bennett Cera & Sidener LLP, San Francisco, California, for the Plaintiff-Appellant.

Jonathan C. Dickey, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Palo Alto, California, for the Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; Marilyn H. Patel, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-02-03072-MHP.

Before: Myron H. BRIGHT,* Dorothy W. NELSON, and Pamela Ann RYMER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

We affirm for reasons stated by the district court in its opinion, Feitelberg v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 234 F.Supp.2d 1043 (N.D.Cal. 2002).*

AFFIRMED.

Notes:

Honorable Myron H. Bright, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation

We deny Feitelberg's Request for Judicial Notice and Merrill Lynch's request for sanctions

Reference

Full Case Name: Jerome Feitelberg, on Behalf of Himself, All Others Similarly Situated, and the General Public v. Merrill Lynch & Co., a Delaware Corporation Thomas Mazzucco Henry Blodget
Cited By: 2 cases
Status: Published