Doe v. Unocal Corp.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Doe v. Unocal Corp., 395 F.3d 978 (9th Cir. 2003)
2003 Daily Journal DAR 1815; 161 Oil & Gas Rep. 670; 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1388; 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 2716; 2003 WL 359787
Doe v. Unocal Corp.
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court,
. Judges Wardlaw, Paez and Berzon were recused.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- John DOE I, individually & as Administrator of the Estate of his child Baby Doe I, & on behalf of all others similarly situated Jane Doe I, on behalf of herself, as Administratrix of the Estate of her child Baby Doe I, & on behalf of all others similarly situated John Doe II John Doe III John Doe IV John Doe V Jane Doe II Jane Doe III John Doe VI John Doe VII John Doe VIII John Doe IX John Doe X John Doe XI, on behalf of themselves & all others similarly situated & Louisa Benson on behalf of herself & the general public v. UNOCAL CORPORATION, a California Corporation Total S.A., a Foreign Corporation John Imle, an individual Roger C. Beach, an individual, Defendants-Appellees John Roe III John Roe VII John Roe VIII John Roe X v. Unocal Corporation Union Oil Company Of California
- Cited By
- 10 cases
- Status
- Published