Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2003

Doe v. Unocal Corp.

Doe v. Unocal Corp.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided February 14, 2003 · Schroeder
395 F.3d 978; 2003 Daily Journal DAR 1815; 161 Oil & Gas Rep. 670; 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1388; 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 2716; 2003 WL 359787 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Doe v. Unocal Corp.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court,1 *979it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

. Judges Wardlaw, Paez and Berzon were recused.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑