MEMORANDUM **

Frank, Gabriela, John Frank, Patricia and Frank Edward Konarski (“the Konarskis”) appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of various public housing officials1 in their civil rights action. The Konarskis alleged that their due process rights were violated when the defendants refused to initiate any new Section 8 housing contracts, or renew any existing Section 8 housing contracts, for apartments owned and leased to Section 8 tenants. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, see Oliver v. Keller, 289 F.3d 623, 626 (9th Cir. 2002) and we affirm.

The Konarskis concede that they failed to “set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial,” in response to defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, summary judgment was proper. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(e); see also Celotex Corp. v. Catrell, 477 U.S. 317, 322-27, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986).

AFFIRMED.