U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2003

United States v. Freegard

United States v. Freegard
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided June 16, 2003 · Rymer, Silverman, Thomas
67 F. App'x 464

United States v. Freegard

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Timothy Brian Freegard appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 120-month sentence for bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a).

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Freegard has filed a brief stating that there are no meritorious issues for review, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Freegard has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no further issues for review. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.