MEMORANDUM **

Julio Garza-Alemon appeals the 84-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to one count of distribution of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) *480and (b)(1)(C). Garza-Alemon’s entire argument on appeal is “that the standard range is excessive and that his young age and family situation should have been taken into account by the court and a lower sentence imposed.” We lack jurisdiction to review the sentence because it was imposed within the 78-87 month range to which the parties stipulated in a binding plea agreement entered pursuant to Fed. R.Crim.P. 11(e)(1)(C) and Garza-Alemon does not contend that the sentence was imposed in violation of law or as a result of an incorrect application of the sentencing guidelines. 18 U.S.C. § 3742(c)(1); United States v. Littlefield, 105 F.3d 527 (9th Cir. 1997).

DISMISSED.