U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2003

United States v. De La Paz-Aguilar

United States v. De La Paz-Aguilar
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided August 18, 2003 · Hawkins, Schroeder, Tashima
71 F. App'x 766

United States v. De La Paz-Aguilar

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Andres De La Paz-Aguilar appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

*767Counsel for Aguilar has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Aguilar has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no further issues for review. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED,

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.