U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2003

United States v. Garcia

United States v. Garcia
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided August 19, 2003
72 F. App'x 710

United States v. Garcia

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Reynaldo Clemente Garcia appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 70-month sen*711tence imposed for distributing methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a). Clemente Garcia’s attorney has filed a brief and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Clemente Garcia has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our review of the Anders brief and our independent review of the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no issues requiring farther review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.