Gilbertson v. Albright
Gilbertson v. Albright
Opinion
368 F.3d 1062
Paul Douglas GILBERTSON, Plaintiff — Appellant,
v.
Stuart H. ALBRIGHT; Keith R. Battleson; Jack W. Burris; Suzanne T. Crane; Charles L. Crump; Yolanda I. Guran-Postlethwaite; Charles W. Hester; Ron A. Hoffine; Robert V. Neathamer; R. Charles Pearson; Ronald E. Stuntzner; David P. Taylor; Robert A. Walker; Richard H. Zbinden, in their individual capacities, Defendants — Appellees.
No. 02-35460.
D.C. No. CV-01-06282-HO.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 17, 2004.
Daniel W. Dickerson, Esq., Portland, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Richard D. Wasserman, AAG, Office of the Attorney General, Salem, OR, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.