Eyak Native Village Chanega Native Village Nanwalek Native Village Port Graham Native Village Tatitlek Native Village v. William M. Daley Donald Evans

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Eyak Native Village Chanega Native Village Nanwalek Native Village Port Graham Native Village Tatitlek Native Village v. William M. Daley Donald Evans, 375 F.3d 1218 (9th Cir. 2004)
2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 14267; 2004 WL 1588113

Eyak Native Village Chanega Native Village Nanwalek Native Village Port Graham Native Village Tatitlek Native Village v. William M. Daley Donald Evans

Opinion

ORDER

The district court decided the federal paramountcy question and thereby avoided determining the existence or extent of the plaintiff villages’ claimed aboriginal rights. As an appellate body, we would be greatly assisted by an initial determination by the district court of what aboriginal rights, if any, the villages have. We therefore VACATE the district court’s order granting summary judgment for defendants. We REMAND with instructions that the district court decide what aboriginal rights to fish beyond'the three-mile limit, if any, the plaintiffs have. For purposes of this limited remand, the district court should assume that the villages’ aboriginal rights, if any, have not been abrogated by the federal paramountcy doctrine or other federal law.

The en banc panel retains jurisdiction over all future proceedings in this matter.

Reference

Full Case Name
EYAK NATIVE VILLAGE; Chanega Native Village; Nanwalek Native Village; Port Graham Native Village; Tatitlek Native Village, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. William M. DALEY; Donald Evans, Defendants-Appellees
Cited By
9 cases
Status
Published