U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2004

Andrew H.K. Wong v. Regents of the University of California

Andrew H.K. Wong v. Regents of the University of California
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided August 18, 2004 · Beezer, Thomas, Clifton
379 F.3d 1097; 15 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1509; 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 17189; 1 Accom. Disabilities Dec. (CCH) 11; 2004 WL 1837752 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Dan Siegel (argued), Hunter Pyle, Sie-gle & Yee, Oakland, CA, for the plaintiff-appellant., Michael T. Lucey, Michael D. Bruno, Joel K. Liberson (argued), Gordon & Rees LLP, San Francisco, CA, for the defendant-appellee.

Andrew H.K. Wong v. Regents of the University of California

Cases that cite this one

20 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Dissenting Opinion

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.