U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2004

Engine Manufacturers Ass'n v. South Coast Air Quality Management District

Engine Manufacturers Ass'n v. South Coast Air Quality Management District
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided May 17, 2004 · Goodwin, McKeown, Rymer
367 F.3d 1173 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Timothy A. French, Esq. Jed R. Mandel, Neal, Gerber and Eisenberg, Chicago, IL, Elizabeth L. MacDowell, Ward L. Ben-shoof, Esq., Anne M. Martorano, Weston, Benshoof, Rochefort, Rubalcava and Mac-Cuish LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant., Fran M. Layton, Esq., Shute, Mihaly and Weinberger, San Francisco, CA, Barbara Baird, Esq., Diamond Bar, CA, Daniel P. Selmi, Esq., Law Office of Daniel P. Selmi, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellees., Gail R. Feuer, Santa Monica, CA, for DefendanNIntervenor-Appellee., Teresa A. Beaudet, Esq., Jerome J. Jauffret, Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Inter-venor., Kipp A. Coddington, Alston & Bird LLP, Washington, DC, Lisa Garvin Copeland, Palm Desert, CA, Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General of New York, Albany, NY, Susan L. Durbin, Sacramento, CA, for Amicus.

Engine Manufacturers Ass'n v. South Coast Air Quality Management District

Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON REMAND FROM THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT

ORDER

The judgment of this court, 309 F.3d 550 (2002), is vacated and the case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Engine Mfr. Assoc. v. S. Coast Air Quality Mgmt. Dist., 541 U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 1756, 158 L.Ed.2d 529 (2004).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.