U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2004

Smith v. City of Hemet

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided June 9, 2004 · Schroeder

371 F.3d 1045; 2004 WL 1305748 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Elizabeth Feffer, Burke Williams & Sor-ensen, LLP., Los Angeles, CA, Aaron C. Harp, Esq., Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP., Irvine, CA, for Defendants-Appel-lees.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Smith v. City of Hemet (9th Cir. 2004)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

*1046ORDER

SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.