U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2004

Alvarez-Machain v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided July 14, 2004 · Fisher, Goodwin, Gould, Kleinfeld, McKeown, Paez, Rymer, Scannlain, Schroeder, Tallman, Thomas

374 F.3d 1384; 2004 WL 1563135 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Alan Rubin, Esq., Epstein, Adelson & Rubin, Peter A. Schey, Esq., Los Angeles, CA, Paul L. Hoffman, Esq., Schonbrun, DeSimone, Seplow, Harris and Hoffman, LLP, Venice, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant., Mary Hampton Mason, Charles S. Leeper, Spriggs & Hollingsworth, Charles J. Cooper, Esq., Hamish P.M. Hume, Esq., Cooper & Kirk, PLLC, Carter G. Phillips, Esq., Sidley, Austin, Brown & Wood, LLP, Washington, DC, Gary S. Lincenberg, Esq., Bird, Marella, Boxer & Wolpert, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Marley v. United States (9th Cir. 2009)
Marley v. United States (9th Cir. 2009)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The judgment of this court, 331 F.3d 604 (2003) (en banc), is vacated and the case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain, 542 U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 2739, 159 L.Ed.2d 718 (2004).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.