Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2004

Naranjo v. Roe

Naranjo v. Roe
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided January 12, 2004 · Kozinski, Noonan, Schwarzer
85 F. App'x 598

Naranjo v. Roe

Opinion of the Court

ORDER**

This appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because petitioner Joel Heredia Naranjo failed to file a timely notice of appeal and the district court found that Naranjo does not qualify for reopening of time under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). The mandate issued on January 2, 2004 is hereby withdrawn.

DISMISSED

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑