Forde v. City of Beverly Hills
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Forde v. City of Beverly Hills, 87 F. App'x 81 (9th Cir. 2004)
Forde v. City of Beverly Hills
Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
Because Castaldo had probable cause to arrest Forde for violation of California Penal Code § 148, her false arrest and false imprisonment claims fail. See Franklin v. Fox, 312 F.3d 423, 438 (9th Cir. 2002).
Forde’s malicious prosecution claim fails because the own recognizance release conditions to which she was subject did not amount to a seizure under the Fourth Amendment. See Karam v. City of Burbank, 352 F.3d 1188, 1193-94 (9th Cir. 2003).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Joan Serioux Wilma FORDE, Plaintiff—Appellant v. CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS Marvin Iannone George Castaldo Sammy Lee Jeffrey Gelfman, Defendants—Appellees
- Status
- Published