Marks v. Lamarque

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Marks v. Lamarque, 88 F. App'x 193 (9th Cir. 2004)
Kozinski, Scannlain, Silverman

Marks v. Lamarque

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Three witnesses identified petitioner as a participant in the victim’s robbery-murder. One of these witnesses further testified that petitioner ordered his accomplice to “bust on” the victim, at which point the accomplice fatally shot the victim. We need not decide whether the admission of petitioner’s confession was erroneous, because in light of the witnesses’ testimony, the confession did not have a “substantial and injurious effect or influence in determining the jury’s verdict.” Brecht v. Abrahamson, 507 U.S. 619, 623, 113 S.Ct. 1710, 123 L.Ed.2d 353 (1993). Any error was therefore harmless.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Reference

Full Case Name
Carl MARKS, Petitioner—Appellant v. A.A. LAMARQUE, Warden, Respondent—Appellee
Status
Published