MEMORANDUM**

Horacio Victorio Emanuelli, a native and citizen of Argentina, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’(“BIA”) summary affirmance of an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, see Meza-Manay v. INS, 139 F.3d 759, 762 (9th Cir. 1998), and we deny the petition for review.

Even assuming that Emanuelli established past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution, the IJ properly relied upon a State Department Country Report to determine that conditions in Argentina have changed such that Emanuelli’s fear of future persecution is not objectively reasonable. See Gonzalez-Hernandez v. Ashcroft, 336 F.3d 995, 1000 (9th Cir. 2003).

Because Emanuelli failed to establish eligibility for asylum, it follows that he failed to satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. See Pedro-Mateo v. INS, 224 F.3d 1147, 1150 (9th Cir. 2000).

Finally, contrary to Emanuelli’s contention, the BIA’s failure to articulate reasons for its decision does not violate due process. See Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft, 350 F.3d 845, 850-51 (9th Cir. 2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.