U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2004

United States v. Mosqueda-Urquides

United States v. Mosqueda-Urquides
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided April 15, 2004 · Bea, Rymer, Scannlain
94 F. App'x 649

United States v. Mosqueda-Urquides

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Dario Mosqueda-Urquides appeals his 63-month sentence, pursuant to a guilty-plea conviction, for illegal reentry by a previously-deported alien in violation of 8 *650U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Mosqueda-Urquides has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our examination of the brief and our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.