U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2004

Franco-Williams v. Ashcroft

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided May 11, 2004 · Kozinski, Thomas, Wallace

96 F. App'x 533

Counsel

Martin Resendez Guajardo, Esq., Law Office of Martin Resendez Guajardo, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner., Regional Counsel, Western Region, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, San Francisco, CA, Elizabeth A. Kessler, Esq., Donald E. Keener, Esq., Michelle E. Gorden, Attorney, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

1. We deny Franco-Williams’ petition for the reasons stated by the Board of Immigration Appeals in its disposition.

2. We deny Franco-Williams’ motion to supplement the administrative record, as the supplement is unnecessary to our decision.

PETITION DENIED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.