U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2004

Chase Bank of Texas, N.A. v. Burger

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided May 19, 2004

97 F. App'x 776

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Leo Burger appeals pro se the district court’s order striking his notice of removal *777of a state court action from San Diego Superior Court. We dismiss.

After unsuccessfully attempting to remove the instant action numerous times, Burger filed a notice of removal under the case number of another pending matter before the United States District Court. The district court’s order striking Burger’s notice of removal is unreviewable, and we therefore lack jurisdiction over this appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d); United Investors Life Ins. Co. v. Waddell & Reed, Inc., 360 F.3d 960, 964 (9th Cir. 2004) (citing Kunzi v. Pan Am. World Airways, Inc., 833 F.2d 1291, 1294 n. 7 (9th Cir. 1987)).

Burger’s remaining contentions lack merit.

We deny all outstanding motions as moot.

DISMISSED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.