U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2004

Al Karshi v. Ashcroft

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided May 20, 2004

97 F. App'x 783

Counsel

Samuel Maina, Law Offices of S. Ouya Maina, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner., Fahd Faisal A1 Karshi, San Francisco, CA, pro se., Regional Counsel, Western Region, Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Earle B. Wilson, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

We affirm the BIA’s finding that A1 Karshi suffered no past persecution, and therefore no presumption of future persecution arises. A1 Karshi did not present sufficient evidence to support a finding of future persecution. See Halaim v. INS, 358 F.3d 1128, 1131-32 (9th Cir. 2004).

PETITION DENIED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.