U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2004

Love v. Pinnacle Nissan, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided June 22, 2004 · Breyer, Fletcher, Hawkins

102 F. App'x 597

Counsel

Stephen G. Montoya, Esq., Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiffs-Appellants., Lonnie J. Williams, Jr., Esq., Quarles & Brady Streich Lang LLP, Phoenix, AZ, Laura M. Franze, Esq., Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Dallas, TX, for Defendants-Appellees.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Herman v. Marana, Town of (United States District Court for the District of Arizona 2020)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Terrill Love filed a racial harassment and constructive discharge claim against Pinnacle Nissan under the 1991 amendments to 42 U.S.C. § 1981. The district court dismissed Love’s claim under Arizona’s two-year statute of limitations for personal injury claims and Love appealed to this court. While submission of the appeal was pending, the Supreme Court decided Jones v. R.R. Donnelley & Sons, — U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 1836, — L.Ed.2d - (2004), holding that claims for racial harassment and constructive discharge pursuant to a post-1990 amendment to § 1981 are governed by the federal “catchall” four-year statute of limitations, 28 U.S.C. § 1658, which preempts application of any state law statutes of limitation. — U.S. at ---, 124 S.Ct. at 1844-46. We accordingly reverse the district court’s dismissal of this case and remand for proceedings in accordance with the proper statute of limitations.

REVERSED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.