U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2004

United States v. Green

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided August 20, 2004 · Kozinski, Pregerson, Rhoades

108 F. App'x 447

Counsel

Wes R. Porter, Esq., Jimmy Chen, Matthew J. Rinka, Esq., United States Attorneys Office, Honolulu, HI, for PlaintiffAppellee., William Mallory Kent, Esq., Jacksonville, FL, for Defendani>-Appellant.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Green v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 2005)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

The government did not breach its plea agreement with defendant. See United States v. Benchimol, 471 U.S. 453, 455, 105 S.Ct. 2103, 85 L.Ed.2d 462 (1985) (per curiam). Defendant waived the right to appeal her sentence, and we therefore dismiss her appeal. Because defendant’s waiver also precludes us from considering her argument based on Blakely v. Washington, — U.S.-, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), we deny her motion for supplemental briefing.

APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING DENIED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.