*450MEMORANDUM **

There was no plain error in the district court’s failure to give a diminished capacity instruction regarding either the attempt charge or the aiding and abetting charge. The diminished capacity defense of voluntary intoxication was waived because it conflicted with the theory of defense which counsel sought to present, namely that Hallmark abandoned the scheme to firebomb the restaurant.

There was also no error in the failure to instruct on the theory of abandonment as a defense to the attempt charge. As the evidence amply demonstrated intent and substantial steps toward commission of the offense, it was legally irrelevant to the attempt charge that Hallmark allegedly dropped the incendiary device, rather than throwing it through the broken window. By that point, the attempt crime was complete. The jury instruction that the district court gave, which set forth the elements of the two offenses, was sufficient.

AFFIRMED.