Pastrana-Godinez v. Ashcroft
Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
Lamberto Pastrana-Godinez appeals his final order of removal on the ground that
We may conduct a limited examination of the record, including the charging documents and judgment, to determine whether an alien was convicted of conduct that is an aggravated felony. See United States v. Franklin, 235 F.3d 1165, 1170 n. 5 (9th Cir. 2000). The charging documents and judgment establish that Pastrana-Godinez was convicted of sexual assault with intent to molest a child and of committing that crime with sexual motivation. Because sexual abuse of a minor and attempted sexual abuse of a minor are aggravated felonies, 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101(43)(A), (U), Pastrana-Godinez was convicted of an aggravated felony and we thus lack jurisdiction to review his removal order. Accordingly, we DISMISS for lack of jurisdiction.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Lamberto PASTRANA-GODINEZ, aka Jesus S. Diaz v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General
- Status
- Published