U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2004

United States v. Melo-Santiago

United States v. Melo-Santiago
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided December 13, 2004 · Goodwin, Trott, Wallace
117 F. App'x 576

United States v. Melo-Santiago

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM**

Sergio Melo-Santiago appeals the sentence imposed following his jury conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Pursuant to Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), and Blakely v. Washington, — U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), Melo-Santiago contends that the district court erred in enhancing his sentence based upon facts that were not alleged in the indictment, proven beyond a reasonable doubt to a jury nor admitted by the defendant. The sole basis for the sentencing enhancement was Melo-Santiago’s prior drug trafficking conviction, and his contention is foreclosed by our holdings in United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411, 414 (9th Cir. 2000), and United States v. Quintana-Quintana, 383 F.3d 1052, 1052-53 (9th Cir. 2004).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.