Viscotti v. Woodford
Viscotti v. Woodford
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOHN LOUIS VISCIOTTI, Nos. 99-99031 Petitioner-Appellee- 99-99032 Cross-Appellant, D.C. No. v. CV-97-04591-R Central District JILL BROWN, Warden, of California State Prison at San Quentin,* of California, Respondent-Appellant- Los Angeles Cross-Appellee. ORDER
ON REMAND FROM THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT Filed May 9, 2005 Before: Harry Pregerson, A. Wallace Tashima, and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges.
ORDER Given the facts, the circumstances, and the record in this case, we deny Petitioner’s Motion for Oral Argument on Post Remand Briefing and remand this case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Woodford v. Visciotti, 537 U.S. 19 (2002). We express no opinion on any of the arguments offered by the parties in their post-remand briefing, as the *Jill Brown is substituted for Jeanne Woodford, her predecessor as Warden of San Quentin State Prison. See Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2).
5003 5004 VISCIOTTI v. BROWN proper course would be for the district court to review and rule on the arguments in the first instance.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2005 Thomson/West.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.