FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 01-50082 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. CR-99-00083- FRANK FERNANDEZ,  DOC-01 Defendant-Appellant. Central District of California,  Los Angeles

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 01-50088 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. CR-99-00083- ROY GAVALDON, aka Spider,  DOC-09 Defendant-Appellant. Central District of California,  Los Angeles

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 01-50126 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v.  CR-99-00083-DOC Central District DAVID GONZALES-CONTRERAS, aka David Contreras-Gonzalez, of California, Defendant-Appellant.  Los Angeles

14345 14346 UNITED STATES v. FERNANDEZ

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 01-50162 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. CR-99-00083- DOMINICK SHEWMAKER GONZALES,  DOC-20 aka Solo, aka Dominick Gonzales, Central District Defendant-Appellant. of California,  Los Angeles

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 01-50373 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. CR-99-00083- JIMMY SANCHEZ, aka Seal D, aka  DOC-4 Smokey, Central District Defendant-Appellant. of California,  Los Angeles

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 01-50513 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. CR-99-00083- SUZANNE SCHOENBERG SANCHEZ,  DOC-25 Central District Defendant-Appellant. of California, Los Angeles  ORDER Filed October 19, 2005 Before: Betty B. Fletcher, William C. Canby, Jr., and Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Circuit Judges.

UNITED STATES v. FERNANDEZ 14347 ORDER The following defendant-appellees have requested remands to the district court for it to consider modification of their sen- tences: Roy Gavaldon, David Gonzales-Contreras, and Domi- nick Shewmaker Gonzales.

Defendant-appellant Fernandez has responded that he does not want a remand for resentencing. His sentence stands affirmed.

The affirmance of Defendant-appellant Schoenberg San- chez’s sentence stands.

The reversal of Defendant-appellant Sanchez’s sentence stands; the mandate has issued in his case.

In our opinion we vacated the sentences of David Gonzales-Contreras and Dominick Shewmaker Gonzales. We amend our opinion to this extent: We remand to the district court to consider whether to resentence, but do not vacate their sentences.

We remand Roy Gavaldon’s sentence to the district court to consider whether to resentence.

The mandate shall issue forthwith on the opinion 388 F.3d 1199 (9th Cir. 2004) as modified by this order.

PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2005 Thomson/West.