U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2005

Javier Diaz-Ramos v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided April 13, 2005 · Goodwin, Beezer, O'Scannlain

404 F.3d 1118; 2005 WL 906273 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Christopher J. Stender, Esq., Stender & Associates, Phoenix, AZ, for Petitioner., Regional Counsel, WEstern Region, Immigration & Naturalization Service, Lagu-na Niguel, CA, District Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Phoenix, AZ, STephen J. Flynn, Office of Immigration Litigation, OIL, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Rodriguez v. Chertoff (9th Cir. 2005)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In light of Lanza v. Ashcroft, 389 F.3d 917 (9th Cir. 2004), the motion of the Attorney General to remand this case to the Board of Immigration Appeals for a clarification of the grounds for its affirmance of the Immigration Judge’s denial of Diaz-Ramos’ cancellation of removal application is GRANTED. This Court will not entertain any further appeals by petitioner concerning whether his removal would result in exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his United States citizen children. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(b); see Romero-Tor *1119 res v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 888 (9th Cir. 2003).

The case, presently set for oral argument on April 15, 2005, in San Francisco, California, is removed from the oral argument calendar.

VACATED and REMANDED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.