ORDER

In light of Lanza v. Ashcroft, 389 F.3d 917 (9th Cir. 2004), the motion of the Attorney General to remand this case to the Board of Immigration Appeals for a clarification of the grounds for its affirmance of the Immigration Judge’s denial of Diaz-Ramos’ cancellation of removal application is GRANTED. This Court will not entertain any further appeals by petitioner concerning whether his removal would result in exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his United States citizen children. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(b); see Romero-Tor *1119 res v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 888 (9th Cir. 2003).

The case, presently set for oral argument on April 15, 2005, in San Francisco, California, is removed from the oral argument calendar.

VACATED and REMANDED.