U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2005

Santiago v. Rumsfeld

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided April 7, 2005 · Coordinator, Thomas

403 F.3d 702; 2005 WL 851216 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

David S. Ettinger, Esq., Lisa R. Jaskol, Esq., Jon B. Eisenberg, Esq., Horvitz & Levy, Encino, CA, Steven Goldberg, Esq., Goldberg, Mechanic, Stuart & Gibson, Lip, Portland, OR, for Petitioner-Appellant., Robert M. Loeb, Esq., H. Thomas Byron, III, Esq., Washington, DC, for Respondents-Appellees., Michael S. Sorgen, Esq., Law Offices of Michael Sorgen, San Francisco, CA, for Amicus.

Opinion of the Court

*703ORDER

The request for initial hearing en banc on the Appellant’s motion for an injunction pending appeal was referred to the entire court. No judge requested a vote of the active non-recused judges on the initial hearing en banc request within the time established for requesting a vote.

Therefore, the request for initial hearing en banc on the motion for an injunction pending appeal is DENIED. The panel shall resume control of the case.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.