Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2005

Doe I v. Unocal Corp.

Doe I v. Unocal Corp.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided April 13, 2005 · Fisher, Fletcher, Graber, Kozinski, McKeown, Nelson, Rawlinson, Reinhardt, Rymer, Schroeder, Tashima
403 F.3d 708; 161 Oil & Gas Rep. 671; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 6070 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Doe I v. Unocal Corp.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The parties’ stipulated motion to dismiss is GRANTED. The appeals (00-56603, 00-56628, 00-57195, and 00-57197) are dismissed with prejudice. Each party is to bear its own costs.

The Appellants’ Unopposed Motion to Vacate District Court Opinion, a motion in which Appellees join, is GRANTED. The district court opinion in Doe v. Unocal Corp., 110 F.Supp.2d 1294 (C.D.Cal. 2000), is VACATED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑