U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2005

Doe I v. Unocal Corp.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided April 13, 2005 · Fisher, Fletcher, Graber, Kozinski, McKeown, Nelson, Rawlinson, Reinhardt, Rymer, Schroeder, Tashima

403 F.3d 708; 161 Oil & Gas Rep. 671; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 6070 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Julie Shaprio, Esq., Tacoma, WA, Anne Richardson, Esq., Hadsell & Stormer, Pasadena, CA, Judith Brown Chomsky, Esq., Elkins Park, PA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants., Jennifer Green, Esq., New York, NY, Paul L. Hoffman, Esq., Schonbrun, Desi-mone, Seplow, Harris and Hoffman, LLP, Venice, CA, Katharine J. Redford, Esq., Wellesley, MA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants/Defendants-Appellees., Edwin V. Woodsome, Jr., Esq., Howrey Simon Arnold & White, LLP., O’Melveny & Myers L.L.P., Peter H. Mason, Esq., Fulbright & Jaworski, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision. The 1 that cite it most often are listed here.

ABECASSIS v. Wyatt (District Court, S.D. Texas 2010)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The parties’ stipulated motion to dismiss is GRANTED. The appeals (00-56603, 00-56628, 00-57195, and 00-57197) are dismissed with prejudice. Each party is to bear its own costs.

The Appellants’ Unopposed Motion to Vacate District Court Opinion, a motion in which Appellees join, is GRANTED. The district court opinion in Doe v. Unocal Corp., 110 F.Supp.2d 1294 (C.D.Cal. 2000), is VACATED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.