Rahman v. Gonzales
Opinion of the Court
The Board of Immigration Appeals’s conclusion that petitioners did not show persecution on account of any protected ground was supported by substantial evidence. See Sangha v. INS, 103 F.3d 1482, 1487, 1490-91 (9th Cir. 1997).
DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Aziz RAHMAN Sabina Rahman Shajid Rahman v. Alberto GONZALES, Attorney General
- Status
- Published