Kumar v. Andree
Kumar v. Andree
Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
Jerry Kumar appeals pro se the district court’s order dismissing his action for defamation and interference in business. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Dole Food Co. v. Watts, 303 F.3d 1104, 1108 (9th Cir. 2002), and we affirm.
The district court properly denied as moot Kumar’s request for entry of default against Canada Stockwatch. See Foster v. Carson, 347 F.3d 742, 745 (9th Cir. 2003).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.