MEMORANDUM****

Petitioner Christian Nwanko seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeal’s (BIA’s) order affirming the Immigration Judge’s (IJ’s) denial of his motion to reopen immigration proceedings. Because the BIA affirmed without opinion pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(e)(4), we review the IJ’s decision. Lanza v. Ashcroft, 389 F.3d 917, 925 (9th Cir. 2004).

Nwanko argues that the IJ abused its discretion by denying Nwanko’s motion to reopen to seek relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”), and also asserts he is entitled to withholding from deportation. This is not, however, the motion to reopen that the IJ ruled upon: before the IJ, the only relief Nwanko sought was to adjust his status based on his marriage to a United States citizen. Nwanko has thus failed to exhaust his administrative remedies with respect to any claim under CAT or for withholding of removal, and his appeal must be dismissed. Cf. Zara v. Ashcroft, 383 F.3d 927, 930-31 (9th Cir. 2004).

PETITION DISMISSED.